[Your Name] · [Email] · [Phone] · [City, ST]
April 21, 2026
Dear Hiring Manager,
I'm applying for the Senior Platform Engineer role on your Developer Experience team. Your public postmortem on the February 2026 ArgoCD drift incident — and the commitment you made to policy-as-code afterward — is exactly the kind of problem I spent the last year solving at Confluent, and I'd like to help you execute on that follow-through.
At Confluent I led the rebuild of our deployment platform from a homegrown Bash-and-Jenkins pipeline to GitHub Actions + ArgoCD with OPA-based policy gates. We cut median deploy time from 38 minutes to 6, got deploy frequency from 2.1 per engineer per week to 9.4, and — more importantly — reduced rollback-triggering incidents from 14 in Q4 2024 to 2 in Q4 2025. The policy-as-code layer was where most of the reliability came from: we encoded 'no direct prod deploy without a passing staging canary' and 'no PII fields added without data-platform approval' as OPA policies that block the PR, not flag it after the fact. 220 engineers now ship under that system and I haven't been paged for a drift incident in seven months.
Before Confluent I was the first SRE hire at a Series B fintech (Column) where I built the on-call rotation, wrote the first Terraform modules, and owned the error-budget conversations with every product team. I care about that part — the human side of reliability — as much as the infra. The reason your DX team caught my eye is that your staff engineering ladder explicitly calls out 'reduces toil for other engineers' as a promotion criterion. Most companies pay lip service to toil reduction; you measure it.
I'd love to walk you through the OPA policy design and hear how your team is thinking about the ArgoCD follow-ups. I can share a redacted copy of our policy bundle or jump on a call whenever works for you.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]